我们向员工发行公司信用卡,他们不使用个人卡来进行业务费用。
All expenses on the cards linked to Concur are company expenses. So there's no such thing as a personal expense that doesn't need to be reimbursed.
The question "Personal Expense (do not reimburse)" on every expense screen is very confusing for our staff. In some instances it has created the impression that it's okay to put a personal expense on the card, which it's not.
有没有办法从用户屏幕中删除此问题?
解决了!去解决方案。
@michaelt可以删除此复选框。我完全理解这会导致员工认为他们可以将个人物品收取到公司卡中的某些问题。
您很可能需要向SAP Concur支持提交支持票,以删除此复选框,除非您在公司的某人参加了适当的培训课程以获得更改字段的许可。
I agree with@munari_alexpertthat if you do remove this checkbox, you have to be prepared for employees to make a personal charge on the corporate card. Usually they do this by mistake. Having an expense type named Personal Expense is a good way to account for those times there is a personal charge on the corporate card.
Let us know here if you have any other questions regarding this.
我指的是8年前我在系统上要求的一个更改,因为我们遇到了类似的问题。就我而言,我们要求同意更改每种费用类型表单,我不记得当时系统是否默认下拉的选择默认为“否”,或者像现在一样选择一个盒子。在所有情况下,从每种费用类型形式中消除了其他要求,但我们添加了一种称为“不可偿还”之类的费用类型,只是为了避免可能发生的任何潜在例外。
我不知道您公司的规模,但是您需要考虑,最终您将获得一些与业务无关的费用。您的公司卡上的酒店费用,其中可能包括水疗中心或迷你吧,或者...最终无法通过您的公司偿还。如果您是系统的管理员,我会通过同意支持票务进行修改。让我知道事情的后续。
@michaelt可以删除此复选框。我完全理解这会导致员工认为他们可以将个人物品收取到公司卡中的某些问题。
您很可能需要向SAP Concur支持提交支持票,以删除此复选框,除非您在公司的某人参加了适当的培训课程以获得更改字段的许可。
I agree with@munari_alexpertthat if you do remove this checkbox, you have to be prepared for employees to make a personal charge on the corporate card. Usually they do this by mistake. Having an expense type named Personal Expense is a good way to account for those times there is a personal charge on the corporate card.
Let us know here if you have any other questions regarding this.